Legal Opinion
Cincinnati & Suburban Bell Telephone Co. v. Rhoades
Ohio Court of Appeals
Decided February 27, 1933No. 4221PublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the Court
HAMILTON, PJ.
The major question of error is the charge of the court with reference to Rule 10 of the Telephone Company, on file with the Public Utilities Commission of Ohio, at Columbus, and approved by it. The rule is as follows:
“Rule 10. The subscriber shall pay monthly or on demand all charges for exchange service and equipment and for toll service. The subscriber assumes responsibility for all charges for exchange service and toll messages originating at the subscriber’s station, and for toll messages received at the subscriber’s station on which the charges have been reversed with the…
2Cited by1 opinion
- Cincinnati Gas & Electric Co. v. ArnoldOhio Court of Appeals · 1978