Legal Opinion

Cincinnati & Suburban Bell Telephone Co. v. Rhoades

Ohio Court of Appeals

Decided February 27, 1933No. 4221PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

HAMILTON, PJ.

The major question of error is the charge of the court with reference to Rule 10 of the Telephone Company, on file with the Public Utilities Commission of Ohio, at Columbus, and approved by it. The rule is as follows:

“Rule 10. The subscriber shall pay monthly or on demand all charges for exchange service and equipment and for toll service. The subscriber assumes responsibility for all charges for exchange service and toll messages originating at the subscriber’s station, and for toll messages received at the subscriber’s station on which the charges have been reversed with the…

2Cited by1 opinion

  1. Cincinnati Gas & Electric Co. v. ArnoldOhio Court of Appeals · 1978

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API