Neuberger v. Barrett
New York Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtRosenman, J.
This is an application for an allowance of counsel and accountants’ fees and expenses, made by all the plaintiffs and by the intervener-plaintiff in this derivative stockholders’ action. There is also an application for counsel fees incurred by the individual defendants, who are directors and officers of the corporation involved in the defense of the action.
The case was settled on the eve of trial with the approval of the court after a hearing attended by the attorneys for all the parties, and after another hearing held before the court on due notice to all the stockholders of the corporation…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Godley v. . Crandall Godley Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1914
- Godley v. Crandall & Godley Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1917
- New York Dock Co. v. McCollumNew York Supreme Court · 1939
- Godley v. Crandall & Godley Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1912
- Apfel v. AuditoreAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1928
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- State Ex Rel. Weede v. BechtelSupreme Court of Iowa · 1952
- Washington Federal Savings & Loan Ass'n v. Village Mall Townhouses, Inc.New York Supreme Court · 1977
- Masholie v. SalvatorNew York Supreme Court · 1944
- Drivas v. LekasNew York Supreme Court · 1944
- Edelman v. GoodmanNew York Supreme Court · 1965
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.