Legal Opinion

Wisconsin Right to Life, Inc. v. Federal Election Commission

Supreme Court of the United States

Decided January 23, 2006No. 04-1581PublishedCited by 46 opinions

1Per curiam

The Bipartisan Campaign Reform Act of 2002 (BCRA), § 203, as amended, 116 Stat. 91, prohibits corporations from using their general treasury funds to pay for any “electioneering communications.” 2 U. S. C. §441b(b)(2) (2000 ed., Supp. III). BCRA §201 defines “electioneering communications” as any broadcast, cable, or satellite communication that refers to a candidate for federal office and that is broadcast within 30 days of a federal primary election or 60 days of a federal general election in the jurisdiction in which that candidate is running for office. 2 U. S. C. § 434(f)(3) (2000 ed.,…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. McConnell v. Federal Election CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 2003

3Cited by46 opinions

  1. Citizens United v. Federal Election CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 2010
  2. Federal Election Commission v. Wisconsin Right to Life, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2007
  3. Gonzales v. CarhartSupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  4. United States v. MarcavageCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2010
  5. Field Day, Llc v. County Of SuffolkCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2006

41 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API