Legal Opinion · Concurrence

Shaughnessy v. Spray

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided December 7, 1981No. A7905-02395, CA 19275Published

1Concurrence

BUTTLER, J.,

specially concurring.

Although I agree that the judgment below should be reversed, I do so because I think the amended complaint was filed within the three-year statute of limitations for wrongful death. 30.020(1).1 I disagree strongly with the majority’s attempt to rewrite that statute; if disposition of this case depends on the meaning of the statute, I would affirm.

I

First, my reasons for disagreement. The majority appears to assume that upon the “wrongful” death of a person, a personal representative pops into being like a genie, and the statute of limitations commences to run…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. State Ex Rel. Kalich v. BrysonOregon Supreme Court · 1969
  2. Schmitt Et Ux v. CulhaneOregon Supreme Court · 1960
  3. Alery v. AleryOregon Supreme Court · 1951

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API