Legal Opinion

Commissioner of Internal Revenue v. Dobbins

Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit

Decided September 13, 1934No. 5407PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

DAVIS, Circuit Judge.

Heretofore, this court determined the law' applicable to this ease on facts which were substantially like those now before the court and in a controversy between the same parties. Dobbins v. Commissioner, 31 F.(2d) 935, 936 (C. C. A. 3). ■ The Commissioner of Internal Revenue in effect has asked that we reconsider the questions involved in that ease in view of subsequent decisions of the courts which he -believes are contrary to our decision.

Briefly, the facts set out before and in this case are as follows:

Edward T. Dobbins died testate and left his residuary estate in…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Helvering v. ButterworthSupreme Court of the United States · 1933
  2. Burnet v. WhitehouseSupreme Court of the United States · 1931
  3. Darcy v. Commissioner of Internal RevenueCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1933
  4. Dobbins v. CommissionerCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1929
  5. Waud v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1931

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Estate of PlattCalifornia Supreme Court · 1942
  2. Lindley's Trust No. 1 v. CommissionerCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1941
  3. Estate of PlattCalifornia Supreme Court · 1942

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API