Legal Opinion

Baltimore & OR Co. v. McBride

Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit

Decided January 13, 1930No. 5252PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HICKENLOOPER, Circuit Judge.

The question presented has a dual aspect, that of the admissibility of evidence of incidental, fright when such fright was not specifically pleaded other than as nervous shoek arising from physical injury; and that of proximate cause or whether recovery may be had for injury to the nervous system from fright occurring subsequent to the actual negligence of defendant and arising from the situation in which the plaintiff found himself immediately after and as a result of the accident. Liability was conceded. The plaintiff was an engineer upon one of the defendant’s…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Milwaukee & Saint Paul Railway Co. v. KelloggSupreme Court of the United States · 1877
  2. Denver & R. G. R. v. RodderCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1900
  3. Illinois Cent. R. v. NelsonCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1914
  4. Pennsylvania Co. v. WhiteCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1917
  5. Lowe v. Metropolitan Street Railway Co.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1910

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Norfolk & Western Railway Co. v. AyersSupreme Court of the United States · 2003
  2. Bertha Kaufman v. Western Union Telegraph CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1955
  3. Johnson v. Kosmos Portland Cement Co.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1933
  4. Petition of United StatesDistrict Court, E.D. North Carolina · 1969
  5. Beaty v. Buckeye Fabric Finishing Co.District Court, E.D. Arkansas · 1959

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API