Legal Opinion

Kohlman v. Ark. Dep't of Human Servs. & Minor Children

Court of Appeals of Arkansas

Decided February 28, 2018No. CV–17–933PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtKenneth S. Hixson, Judge

Appellant Steven Kohlman appeals from the termination of his parental rights to his children J.K., As.K., Au.K., and B.K., who range in age from three to seven years old.1 On appeal, Steven argues that he was denied due process because he was *597not made a party or offered services until the petition to terminate his parental rights was filed, and he also argues that the termination order should be reversed because there was insufficient proof of statutory grounds or that termination was in the children's best interest. We affirm.

We review termination-of-parental-rights cases de novo. Mitchell…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. J.T. v. Arkansas Department of Human ServicesSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1997
  2. Anderson v. DouglasSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1992
  3. Wafford v. Arkansas Department of Human ServicesCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 2016
  4. Draper v. Arkansas Department of Human ServicesCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 2012

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Harjo v. Ark. Dep't of Human Servs.Court of Appeals of Arkansas · 2018
  2. Riggs v. Ark. Dep't of Human Servs.Court of Appeals of Arkansas · 2019
  3. Kosmic Kidz Outreach, Inc., and Fredrick Jackson v. Arkansas Department of Human ServicesCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 2020
  4. Northcross v. Ark. Dep't of Human Servs.Court of Appeals of Arkansas · 2018
  5. Tovias v. Ark. Dep't of Human Servs.Court of Appeals of Arkansas · 2019

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API