Legal Opinion

Commonwealth v. Romesburg

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided May 19, 1986No. 692PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WIEAND, Judge:

The major issue raised in this direct appeal from a judgment of sentence imposed for driving while under the influence of alcohol is whether the Commonwealth’s use of the results of field sobriety tests violated the guarantee against self-incrimination contained in Article I, Section 9 of the Pennsylvania Constitution. Appellant also challenges (1) the relevance of the results of a blood test taken two hours after arrest and (2) the Commonwealth’s right to use the test results where the sample of his blood had been destroyed and was not available for independent testing. We…

2Cases cited28 opinions

  1. United States v. WadeSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  2. Schmerber v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  3. Holt v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1910
  4. Brown v. WalkerSupreme Court of the United States · 1896
  5. Commonwealth v. DuggerSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1985

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. ConwaySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1987
  2. Commonwealth v. PhillipsSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1997
  3. Commonwealth v. HayesSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1996
  4. Commonwealth v. MunizSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1988
  5. Commonwealth v. CurranSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1997

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API