Legal Opinion
State v. Anaya
Court of Appeals of Arizona
Decided September 19, 1991No. 2 CA-CR 90-0110PublishedCited by 12 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
ROLL, Presiding Judge.
Defendant Urbano Carnero Anaya appeals from his convictions for aggravated assault and endangerment. Because a co-defendant failed to offer a racially neutral explanation for his exercise of peremptory challenges resulting in the exclusion of two black venirepersons, we vacate the judgment of guilt and remand this matter to the trial court for further proceedings.
FACTS
On May 8, 1989, deputies from the Pima County Sheriff’s Office responded to a call and discovered defendant Anaya and co-defendant Paul Morris on a Tucson street pointing firearms at each other.
After…
2Cases cited27 opinions
- Batson v. KentuckySupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Bruton v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
- Polk County v. DodsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
- Doyle v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Swain v. AlabamaSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- State of Arizona v. Steven John ParkerArizona Supreme Court · 2013
- State v. MannArizona Supreme Court · 1997
- State v. CruzArizona Supreme Court · 1993
- State v. CramerCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1992
- State v. LongshawCourt of Appeals of Utah · 1998
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.