Legal Opinion

Quartucci v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided June 30, 1999No. 99-1727PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Per curiam

We affirm the order denying appellant’s motion to correct illegal sentence, seeking additional jail time credit, without prejudice to his filing (1) a rule 3.800 motion that affirmatively states where in the record the information concerning his jail service can be found and how the record demonstrates his entitlement to the additional days of jail time credit sought, or (2) a properly sworn rule 3.850 motion challenging the sentence based on the failure to award all jail time credit to which appellant is entitled. See Daily v. State, — So.2d -, 1999 WL 212859 (Fla. 4th DCA Apr.7, 1999); Toro…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. State v. MancinoSupreme Court of Florida · 1998
  2. Toro v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1998
  3. Daily v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1999

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Carridine v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1999
  2. Lee v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2000

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API