Alabama State Bar v. Hallett
Supreme Court of Alabama
1Concurring in part, dissenting in partMurdock, Justice
A. Reinstating the Panel’s Findings of Violations
Although I believe we should reinstate the panel’s findings as to what rules Hal-lett violated, I do not agree with all the reasoning used by the panel or by the main opinion to reach this result.
First, I am concerned that a statement in the panel’s decision could be construed as endorsing a “reasonableness” standard for the evaluation of allegedly excessive attorney fees. Second, I am concerned about the conflation of the concept of “clearly excessive fees” and the separate and different concept of “unearned fees,” a concept that relates to…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Dykes v. Lane Trucking, Inc.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1994
- Parsons v. AaronSupreme Court of Alabama · 2002
- First Properties, L.L.C. v. BennettCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 2006
- Bess v. Waffle House, Inc.Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 2001
- Ex Parte CaseSupreme Court of Alabama · 2005
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.