Legal Opinion

Bearden v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas

Decided April 13, 1983No. 64148PublishedCited by 86 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

MILLER, Judge.

This is an appeal from a misdemeanor conviction for driving while intoxicated; the punishment is three days confinement and a $200 fine.

The sufficiency of the evidence is not challenged. In his first ground of error, appellant contends that the trial court erred in overruling his motion for new trial because of jury misconduct.

On July 16 and 17, appellant was tried before a jury for the misdemeanor offense of driving while intoxicated. The jury convicted him and appellant elected to have the court set punishment. On July 26, 1979, appellant filed an original motion for…

2Cases cited32 opinions

  1. Stephenson v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1973
  2. Hicks v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1913
  3. Hunt v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1980
  4. Vyvial v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1928
  5. Rogers v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1977

27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by86 opinions

  1. McIntire v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1985
  2. Belton v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 8th District (El Paso)1995
  3. Dugard v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1985
  4. Mallet v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas · 2000
  5. Klapesky v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin)2008

81 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API