Legal Opinion

State v. Suber

Supreme Court of South Carolina

Decided May 30, 1911No. 7923PublishedCited by 15 opinions

Before W. T. Aycock, Special Judge, Richland, Spring term, 1911. Indictment against Nannie Bee Súber for murder of Hattie Súber. Defendant appeals. cites: Code 1902, 2950; 79 S. C. 175; 61 S. C. 22; 1 Green. 33-4; 13 Cyc. 537; 28 B. R. A. 40; 74 Cal. 570; 78 Ky. 643; 58 Miss. 386; 84 Wis. 188-9; 134 Mass. 503; 10 Ind. 561; 123 111. 195; 24 Ba. Ann. 46-7; 5 B. R. A. 776; 3 Parker, Cr. R. 25. cites: 1 Bish. New Cr. Proc. 965; 79 S. C. 174; 83 S. C. 82.

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the Court was delivered by

Mr. Justice Gary.

The defendant was indicted for murder, and found guilty with a recommendation to mercy.

Prom the sentence imposed upon her, she appealed to this Court.

The exceptions raise the question, whether there was error, on the part of his Honor, the presiding Judge, in refusing the motion for a new trial, made on the ground, that the presiding Judge, did not accompany the jury, when it was sent by him, to view the place, where the homicide was committed.

1 There is, however, a preliminary question, to wit, whether the appellant waived the right,…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. State v. AdamsSupreme Court of Kansas · 1878
  2. State v. MortensenUtah Supreme Court · 1903

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. State v. PlathSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1984
  2. John D. Arnold v. Parker Evatt, Commissioner, South Carolina Department of Corrections T. Travis Medlock, Attorney General, State of South CarolinaCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1997
  3. Commonwealth v. DarcySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1949
  4. People v. DevinIllinois Supreme Court · 1982
  5. State v. CatesMontana Supreme Court · 1934

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API