Legal Opinion
Auld v. Sears
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided February 18, 1941PublishedCited by 18 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Judgment of the City Court of White Plains reversed on the law and the facts, with costs, and the complaint dismissed on the law, with costs. Carswell, Johnston, Adel and Close, JJ., concur with the following memorandum: The plaintiff, either in January, 1936, or January, 1937, purchased an electric washing machine from the defendant. It was used weekly to do the washing for a family of four from the date of its purchase until August 3, 1938, when the plaintiff’s wife was injured by the wringer swinging around suddenly and striking her at a time when she was pulling a sheet through the…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- MacPherson v. . Buick Motor Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1916
- Willson v. . Faxon, Williams FaxonNew York Court of Appeals · 1913
- Halloran v. Parke, Davis & Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1935
- Winkler v. American Sundries Co., Inc.New York Court of Appeals · 1937
3Cited by18 opinions
- Micallef v. Miehle Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1976
- Campo v. ScofieldNew York Court of Appeals · 1950
- Mickle v. BlackmonSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1969
- Penn v. Inferno Manufacturing CorporationLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1967
- Byrnes v. Economic MacHinery Co.Michigan Court of Appeals · 1972
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.