Legal Opinion

Skzypek v. Long Island Railroad

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided June 14, 1935Published

1Dissent

Hagarty, J. (dissenting).

I dissent and vote to affirm.

Plaintiff’s intestate, while crossing defendant railroad’s right-of-way, was killed by coming in contact with the third rail, which was protected by a board covering. The complaint was dismissed at the close of the plaintiff’s case. Plaintiff does not claim that there was a street crossing or public right-of-way at the point where his intestate met her death, but contends that a question of fact was presented as to whether or not, by reason of long usage by the public, the defendant had acquiesced in such crossing by pedestrians at the…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Barry v. . N.Y.C. H.R.R.R. Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1883
  2. Keller v. . Erie Railroad Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1905
  3. Lamphear v. . N.Y.C. H.R.R.R. Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1909
  4. Gleason v. Central New England Railway Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1933
  5. Jerzewski v. Erie RailroadAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1925

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API