Legal Opinion

Coffelt v. Arkansas State Highway Commission

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided June 30, 1986No. 86-34PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Robert H. Dudley, Justice.

This is the second appeal of this condemnation case. See Coffelt v. Arkansas State Highway Commission, 285 Ark. 314, 686 S.W.2d 786 (1985). We affirm the trial court because the appellant has flagrantly violated Rules 9(c) and (d) of the Rules of the Supreme Court and the Court of Appeals.

In the section of her brief entitled “Abstract of Record” the appellant has not used the first person and has reprinted a major part of the trial transcript. A reprint of a major part of the transcript is not an abstract. We have consistently held that this type of flagrant…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Gray v. Ouachita Creek Watershed Dist.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1965
  2. Harris v. Arkansas Real Estate CommissionSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1982
  3. Board of Education v. Ozark School District No. 14Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1983
  4. Coffelt v. Arkansas State Highway CommissionSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1985
  5. Smith v. PondSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1976

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Forrest City MacHine Works, Inc. v. MosbacherSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1993
  2. Arkansas State Highway Commission v. MunsonSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1988
  3. Arkansas State Highway Commission v. CoffeltSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1990
  4. Brooks v. StateCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 2013
  5. Brooks v. StateCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 2013

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API