Redhead v. Skidmore Land Co.
Wisconsin Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtRosenberry, J.
The judgment of dismissal is attacked on the ground that the undisputed evidence shows that the amount of incumbrances was deducted from the consideration; that under such circumstances there is an implied promise on the part of the purchaser, in the absence of an express agreement to the contrary, to assume the payment of the incumbrances. This contention presents a question of law. Other facts which might have some bearing upon the question are that the defendant, after the execution and delivery of the deed, paid the interest upon the mortgages; that no claim was made upon the plaintiff by…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Chase v. American Cartage Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1922
- Elliott v. SackettSupreme Court of the United States · 1883
- Belmont v. . ComanNew York Court of Appeals · 1860
- Fiske v. TolmanMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1878
- Kneeland v. City of MilwaukeeWisconsin Supreme Court · 1862
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Pelser v. GingoldSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1943
- Peterson v. LaMayWisconsin Supreme Court · 1972