Legal Opinion

Brooks v. Herren

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided October 9, 1929No. 8255PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSmith, J.

The appeal is from an order overruling appellant’s plea of privilege, which was filed and urged in due form and time. To this plea appellee, in due course, presented a controverting affidavit.

Upon the hearing of the matter, no evidence of any character was adduced or considered, and the trial judge determined the issue solely upon the mere allegations in the controverting plea; it being conceded that the plea of privilege was in due form and presented a prima facie ease entitling appellant to a change of venue.

It is first contended by appellant that ap-pellee’s controverting plea was not…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Meadows & Co. v. TurnerCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1925
  2. Jacobson v. BerwickCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1926
  3. Russell Grader Mfg. Co. of Texas, Inc. v. McMillinCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1925
  4. Penix v. DavisCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1924
  5. Waxahachie Nat. Bank v. Sigmond Rothschild Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1921

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Compton v. ElliottCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1932
  2. Gulf Refining Co. v. LipscombCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1931
  3. Hicks v. SmithCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1934

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API