Legal Opinion

De Arce v. Perez

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided September 7, 1993No. 92-1409Published

1Per curiam

Affirmed. Fisher v. Shenandoah Gen. Constr. Co., 498 So.2d 882 (Fla.1986); Hoyt v. Corbett, 559 So.2d 98, 100 (Fla. 4th DCA), rev. denied, 569 So.2d 1278 (Fla.1990); Weller v. Reitz, 419 So.2d 739 (Fla. 5th DCA 1982); Pino v. Lopez, 361 So.2d 192 (Fla. 3d DCA), cert. denied, 365 So.2d 714 (Fla.1978); Freeman v. Equilease Corp., 346 So.2d 619 (Fla. 3d DCA 1977); Sherman v. Weintraub, 132 So.2d 421 (Fla. 3d DCA 1961); Fla.R.Civ.P. 1.510(e); § 440.09(1), Fla.Stat. (1989).

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Fisher v. Shenandoah General Construction Co.Supreme Court of Florida · 1986
  2. Pino v. LopezDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1978
  3. Weller v. ReitzDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1982
  4. Hoyt v. CorbettDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1990
  5. Freeman v. Equilease Corp.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1977

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API