Legal Opinion

Foster v. Warner

Idaho Supreme Court

Decided July 9, 1926PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtBUDCrE, J.

On October 29, 1918, one Harper, as agent for respondent, contracted with appellant for the purchase of certain honey in two lots, and as an advance on the purchase price appellant was paid the sum of $330. The bases of the agreement entered into were two bills of sale executed and delivered by appellant, one of which reads as follows:

“This is to certify that A. A. Warner of Buhl, Idaho, has this 29 day of Oct. 1918 bargained and sold to Chas. H. Harper the following described honey, and does hereby guarantee the title thereto, viz.:
“50 cases (2 60# cans to case) of extract honey (white) the…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Quality Clothes Shop v. KeeneyIndiana Court of Appeals · 1914
  2. Miller v. SteenCalifornia Supreme Court · 1866
  3. Pierce v. StaubSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1906
  4. Sabas v. GregorySupreme Court of Connecticut · 1916
  5. Lashonse v. HerrickIdaho Supreme Court · 1924

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Foster v. WarnerIdaho Supreme Court · 1929

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API