Legal Opinion

Bardacke v. Dunigan

New Mexico Supreme Court

Decided August 27, 1982No. 14281PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

RIORDAN, Justice.

This action was commenced in the district court by plaintiff-appellee Paul G. Bardacke (Bardacke), a candidate for the Democratic nomination for State Attorney General, challenging defendant-appellant Thomas R. Dunigan’s (Dunigan) right to appear on the June primary election ballot for the same office.

On March 2,1982, Bardacke and Dunigan, along with one other candidate, filed statements of candidacy for convention designation, each seeking the nomination for State Attorney General by the Democratic party. No challenge was filed attacking the number or validity of the…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Cave v. CaveNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1970
  2. Valdez v. HerreraNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1944
  3. Ralph L. Brutsche and Ingrid Brutsche v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue, Ruth L. Farley v. Commissioner of Internal RevenueCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1978

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Simmons v. McDanielNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1984

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API