Legal Opinion

Travelers Indemnity Company v. Atlantic Express Line, Pacindat Mutual Protection & Indemnity Association, Ltd.

Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit

Decided May 16, 1988No. 86-3927PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ON PETITION FOR REHEARING

(Opinion Feb. 8, 1988, 5th Cir.1988, 837 F.2d 187)

Before REAVLEY, WILLIAMS and HIGGINBOTHAM, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM:

IT IS ORDERED that the petition for rehearing filed in the above entitled and numbered cause be and the same is hereby DENIED.

In its motion for rehearing Paeindat Mutual Protection & Indemnity Association, Ltd., raises two issues. The first is that in upholding the service of process under the Louisiana longarm statute, we relied upon a case which had been decided after service was accomplished. A reading of our opinion in this case reveals that we…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Travelers Indemnity Co. v. Atlantic Express Line, Pacindat Mutual Protection & Indemnity Association, Ltd.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1988

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Sam C. Gonzales v. The Prudential Insurance Co. Of AmericaCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1990
  2. Delaune v. Saint Marine Transportation Co.District Court, E.D. Louisiana · 1990
  3. (PC) Jones v. BeneviousDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2023
  4. (PC) Mendoza v. MattesonDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2023
  5. Britton v. Arizona, State ofDistrict Court, D. Arizona · 2022

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API