In re City of New York
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Appeal by The Oity of New York from an order of the Supreme Oourt, made at the New York Special Term and entered in the office of the clerk of the county of New York on the 7th day of July, 1902, taxing the costs, charges and expenses of the commissioners of estimate and assessment appointed in the proceeding.
1Opinion of the Court
O’Brien, J.:
In this proceeding the Special Term was called upon to determine what fees should reasonably be allowed the commissioners, and, upon the ground that the practice followed and the determina, tion reached were erroneous, the city has. appealed. We deem it necessary only to advert to the practice which we think requires a reversal of the order.
Prior to making up their final report, the commissioners gave *91notice that their bill of costs would be presented for taxation in accordance with the provisions of section 999 of the Greater New York charter (Laws of 1897, chap. 378), as amended…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Poillon v. PoillonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1902
3Cited by6 opinions
- Held v. KaufmanAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1997
- Chapuis v. LongAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1902
- Wosyluk v. L.T.L. Developers, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1989
- In re East 182d St.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1902
- In re RegulaNew York Supreme Court · 1988
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.