Legal Opinion

Pell v. City of New York

New York Supreme Court

Decided June 15, 1900PublishedCited by 2 opinions

Action to recover hack money paid under compulsion of a threatened sale for an illegal assessment.

1Opinion of the CourtMoAdam, J.

The action, is to recover back from the city the amount of an assessment paid by the plaintiffs for paving Mangin street from Grand to Houston street, on the ground that the assessment was illegally laid. The plaintiffs paid the assessment after a threatened sale of their property. Such a payment is not regarded as voluntary, but the result of legal compulsion. Poth v. Mayor, 151 N. Y. 16. The assessment was confirmed August 7, 1892. The property had been previously assessed for paving the same street, and the expense thereof had been paid by the property owners. The Consolidation Act of 1882…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Poth v. Mayor, Aldermen & Commonalty of New YorkNew York Court of Appeals · 1896
  2. Matter of Petition of SmithNew York Court of Appeals · 1885

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. In re FuerthAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1929
  2. Segfried Construction Co. v. City of New YorkCity of New York Municipal Court · 1925

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API