Legal Opinion

Lancaster v. Cox

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided June 11, 1925No. 3081. [fn*]PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWillson, C. J.

(after stating the facts as above).

One of the issues presented by the pleadings in the case was as to whether appellants violated a rule of the Interstate Commerce Commission requiring a locomotive used in road service between sunset and sunrise to have a headlight which would afford sufficient illumination to enable a person in the cab of the locomotive, possessing the “usual visual capacity required of locomotive engineers, to see, in a clear atmosphere, a dark object as large as a man of average size standing erect at a distance of at least 800 feet ahead and in front of such headlight.”

The…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Railway Co. v. ThomasonSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1894
  2. St. Louis, Memphis & Southeastern Railway Co. v. ShannonSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1905
  3. Guarantee Mercantile Co. v. Jefferson Farmers' Union Cotton Warehouse Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1923

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. St. Louis S.W. Ry. Co. of Texas v. BishopCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1927
  2. Texas & N. O. R. v. OzunaCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1954

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API