Legal Opinion

Opinion No.

Texas Attorney General Reports

Decided July 30, 1982Published

1Opinion of the Court

Honorable Bill Clayton Speaker of the House of Representatives Capitol Building Austin, Texas 78711

Re: Use of topical ocular pharmaceutical agents by optometrists, and related matters

Dear Speaker Clayton:

You have posed several questions concerning the authority of the Texas State Board of Medical Examiners to promulgate and enforce administrative rules implementing section 3.06(d)(5) of the new Medical Practice Act, article 4495b, V.T.C.S. That subsection deals with the administration by optometrists of topical ocular pharmaceutical agents, which are medicinal drugs applied to surface areas…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Railroad Commission of Texas v. Shell Oil Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1942
  2. Spann v. City of DallasTexas Supreme Court · 1921
  3. Gerst v. NixonTexas Supreme Court · 1966
  4. Sparger v. Worley Hospital, Inc.Texas Supreme Court · 1977
  5. Blumenthal v. Board of Medical ExaminersCalifornia Supreme Court · 1962

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API