Pittsburgh, Chicago, Cincinnati & St. Louis Railway Co. v. Ireton
Indiana Court of Appeals
From Randolph Circuit Court'; Theodore Shockney, Judge. Action by Albert Ireton against the Pittsburgh, Chicago, Cincinnati and St. Louis Railway Company. From a judgment for plaintiff, the defendant appeals.
1Opinion of the Court 1
Statement by
Dausman, J.
This action was instituted by appellee against appellant to recover damages for personal injuries. So much of the complaint as is necessary to an understanding of the questions presented is as follows: “Defendant is a common carrier by rail, engaged in interstate commerce, and maintains a switch yard at Richmond, Indiana. Certain tracks in said yard are known as repair tracks, on which defend*451ant places cars for the purpose of having thém repaired by its workmen. On Feb. 6, 1914, plaintiff was in the employ of defendant as a car repairman. On said day the defendant had a…
Also in this document: Opinion of the Court · Dausman.
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Choctaw, Oklahoma & Gulf R. R. v. McDadeSupreme Court of the United States · 1903
- Burnet v. Desmornes Y AlvarezSupreme Court of the United States · 1912
- Pennsylvania Co. v. StalkerIndiana Court of Appeals · 1918
- State ex rel. Salt Creek Civil Township v. StevensIndiana Court of Appeals · 1918
3Cited by2 opinions
- Cleveland, Cincinnati, Chicago & St. Louis Railroad v. BelangeIndiana Court of Appeals · 1922
- Pennsylvania Railroad v. MartinIndiana Court of Appeals · 1930