Legal Opinion

Kevin Richard Stas v. Naples Land Yacht Harbor, Inc., and Michael A. Espinola

District Court, M.D. Florida

Decided September 8, 2026No. 2:25-cv-00809Unknown

1Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF FLORIDA FORT MYERS DIVISION KEVIN RICHARD STAS, Plaintiff, v. Case No. 2:25-cv-809-KCD-KRH NAPLES LAND YACHT HARBOR, INC., and MICHAEL A. ESPINOLA, Defendants. / ORDER Before the Court is Defendants’ Motion to Compel Discovery. (Doc. 79).1 Although Defendants specifically identify specific Requests for Interrogatories and Production, see, e.g., (Doc. 79 at 5, 14, and 16), Defendants also state “[c]ollectively, the Stases have not produced one (1) responsive document.” (Doc. 79 at 23). To that end, the Court construes Defendants’ Motion as a…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Chudasama v. Mazda Motor Corp.Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1997
  2. Nathaniel Porter, Jr. v. Walter S. Ray, Jr.Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2006
  3. Commercial Union Insurance Company v. Eugene Westrope, John Jetter, Loretta Jetter, and Joe Alday, Nathan Overstreet, Jr.Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1984
  4. Franklin Ex Rel. Estate of Franklin v. Garden State Life InsuranceCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2012
  5. Adelman v. Boy Scouts of AmericaDistrict Court, S.D. Florida · 2011

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API