Peabody v. Cortada
New York Supreme Court
Appeal from special term, New York county. Action by Henry W. Peabody and another against Emilio Cortada and another. Defendants answered, setting up SJ counterclaim. From an order requiring them to file a bill of particulars, defendants appeal.
1Opinion of the CourtVan Brunt, P. J.
This appeal is taken from an order directing the defendants to furnish a bill of particulars of the counterclaim based on the alleged breach by the plaintiffs of an agreement to protect the defendants’ credit by paying certain drafts. The answer alleges, among other things, that numerous persons having accounts with the defendants, which accounts were for great sums of money, and from which the defendants derived great profits, in consequence of the dishonor of the drafts, and the loss of the defendants’ credit thereby, withdrew their accounts, and refused and still refuse to do any business…
2Cited by5 opinions
- Commercial National Bank of Chicago v. HandAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1896
- Bell v. HeathertonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1901
- Jacobs v. Water Overflow Preventive Co.New York Supreme Court · 1893
- Commercial National Bank v. HandAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1896
- Dueber Watch Case Manufacturing Co. v. American Waltham Watch Co.New York Supreme Court · 1893