Legal Opinion

Timothy Devereux v. Rene DiBenedetto

Indiana Court of Appeals

Decided November 6, 2015No. 49A02-1411-CT-780PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MAY, Judge.

[1] Timothy Devereux. appeals the denial of his motion for summary judgment. He argues Rene DiBenedetto’s claim against him was barred by the limitations period set forth in her contract with Con-our Law Firm, LLC (“the Firm”). DiBen-edetto argues Devereux is not a party to the contract she made with the Firm or, in the alternative, the contract’s language shortening the limitations period was the product of unfair dealing, violated Rule of Professional Responsibility 1.8(h), and violates public policy. DiBenedetto cross-appeals, asserting the trial court erred when it did not rule…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Antonio Hughley v. State of Indiana, The Consolidated City of Indianapolis/Marion County, and The Indianapolis Metropolitan Police DepartmentIndiana Supreme Court · 2014
  2. Briggs v. Clinton County Bank & Trust Co. of FrankfortIndiana Court of Appeals · 1983
  3. Moreno v. SanchezCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2003
  4. Charnay v. CobertCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2006
  5. Galanis v. Lyons & TruittIndiana Supreme Court · 1999

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Kailee M. Smith and Jeffrey S. McQuary v. State of IndianaIndiana Court of Appeals · 2019
  2. Rene DiBenedetto v. Timothy DevereuxIndiana Court of Appeals · 2017
  3. Rene DiBenedetto v. Timothy DevereuxIndiana Court of Appeals · 2017

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API