Legal Opinion
In Re Save Venice New York, Inc.
Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Decided July 27, 2001No. 00-1450, 75/222,218PublishedCited by 33 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
GAJARSA, Circuit Judge.'
This case involves an appeal from the United States Patent and Trademark Office Trademark Trial and Appeal Board (“Board”). Save Venice New York, Inc. (“Save Venice”) appeals the decision of the Board affirming the final rejection of Application Serial No. 75/222,218 for a composite mark consisting of the phrases “THE VENICE COLLECTION” and “SAVE VENICE INC.” and an image of the winged Lion of St. Mark. Because we find the Board’s refusal to register the mark was based on substantial evidence, we affirm.
BACKGROUND
Save Venice is a not-for-profit New York corporation…
2Cases cited23 opinions
- Anderson v. City of Bessemer CitySupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Dickinson v. ZurkoSupreme Court of the United States · 1999
- Dickinson v. ZurkoSupreme Court of the United States · 1999
- Yale Electric Corporation v. RobertsonCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1928
- In Re National Data CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1985
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by33 opinions
- In Re: Cordua Restaurants, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2016
- New York City Triathlon, LLC v. Nyc Triathlon Club, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 2010
- In Re Viterra Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2012
- Citigroup Inc. v. Capital City Bank Group, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2011
- Japan Telecom, Inc., a California Corporation v. Japan Telecom America Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2002
28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.