In re Warp
Court of Customs and Patent Appeals
1Opinion of the CourtBland, Judge
Appellant here appeals from a decision of the Board of Appeals of the United States Patent Office affirming the decision of the examiner who, after allowing one claim, rejected claims 18,19, 21, 22, 23 and 24 of appellant’s application relating to laminated material.
This appeal is a companion appeal with Patent Appeal No. 5100, the applications involved in both appeals being copending in the Patent Office. The companion appeal related to substantially the identical material involved here except that there a wire mesh netting was used while in the instant application the mesh upon which the…
2Cited by1 opinion
- Sinclair Weeks, Secretary of Commerce, and Robert C. Watson, Commissioner of Patents v. Harold Warp, and Flex-O-Glass, an Illinois CorporationCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1955