Legal Opinion

In re Warp

Court of Customs and Patent Appeals

Decided March 4, 1946No. 5086PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtBland, Judge

Appellant here appeals from a decision of the Board of Appeals of the United States Patent Office affirming the decision of the examiner who, after allowing one claim, rejected claims 18,19, 21, 22, 23 and 24 of appellant’s application relating to laminated material.

This appeal is a companion appeal with Patent Appeal No. 5100, the applications involved in both appeals being copending in the Patent Office. The companion appeal related to substantially the identical material involved here except that there a wire mesh netting was used while in the instant application the mesh upon which the…

2Cited by1 opinion

  1. Sinclair Weeks, Secretary of Commerce, and Robert C. Watson, Commissioner of Patents v. Harold Warp, and Flex-O-Glass, an Illinois CorporationCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1955

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API