Legal Opinion

Cincinnati Equipment Co. v. Big Muddy River Consolidated Coal Co.

Court of Appeals of Kentucky

Decided March 27, 1914PublishedCited by 9 opinions

Appeal from Jefferson Circuit Court (Chancery Branch, Second Division).

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion op the Court by

Judge Settle

Affirming.

This action, as originally framed, sought the reformation of an alleged written contract claimed to have been made between appellant and appellee Oct. 12,1907, for the sale by the former to the latter of 100 second-hand coal cars at $7Of) per car; 25 per cent of the aggregate price to be paid in cash, the remainder in twelve equal monthly installments, beginning after January 1, 1908; it being alleged in the petition that the contract as agreed on provided that the cars were to be delivered December 1, 1907 and that the first deferred monthly…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Freeland v. RitzMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1891
  2. Carpenter v. HolcombMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1870
  3. Boisseau v. FullerSupreme Court of Virginia · 1898
  4. Elmore, Quillian & Co. v. Parrish Bros.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1911
  5. Compania Bilbaina De Navegacion, De Bilbao v. Spanish-American Light & Power Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1892

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Industrial Equipment Company, Plaintiff-Appellee-Cross-Appellant v. Emerson Electric Company, Defendant-Appellant-Cross-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1977
  2. Spero-Nelson v. BrownCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1949
  3. Dohrman v. SullivanCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1949
  4. New Headley Tobacco Warehouse Co. v. Gentry's Ex'rCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1948
  5. Bowley v. FullerSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1921

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API