Legal Opinion · Dissent

Witmer v. Arkansas Dailies, Inc.

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided May 12, 1941No. 4-6426Published

1DissentMcHaney, J.

The majority opinion has substantially and correctly stated the facts, but, in my opinion has clearly misapplied the law to the facts, which are without substantial dispute. Appellee, Arkansas Dailies, Inc., is a small corporation with a capital stock of $10,000, all of which has been expended in developing and building a purely service organization, with the exception of a small amount invested in office equipment. Its assets are intangibles, consisting of contracts with daily newspapers in Arkansas and in neighboring states to supply them with foreign advertising which it solicited and…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Trice v. ComstockCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1903
  2. Fulton Grand Laundry Co. v. JohnsonCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1922
  3. El Dorado Laundry Co. v. FordSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1927
  4. Southwest Pump & MacHinery Co. v. ForslundMissouri Court of Appeals · 1930
  5. Dudney v. WilsonSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1929

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API