Legal Opinion
Eyers v. Haddem
U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Western Wisconsin
Decided November 30, 1895PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
JÍFXX, District Judge.
Tills is an action brought: by the plaintiffs, who are citizens of Xorth Dakota, against tin» defendants, who are citizens of Wisconsin, npon a warranty in the sale of a stallion. The defendants art* importers of blooded horses at Janesville, Win., and on March 11, Í89J, sold to the defendants an imported stallion, by a bill of salt* containing tin* following' printed warranty:
“We hereby guaranty the above-named horse to be a reasonable foal getter, with proper care and handling. In case he should prove not to be so. we agree to replace him with another horse of same…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Park v. Richardson & Boynton Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1892
- Himes v. KiehlSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1893
- Mandel v. ButtlesSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1875
- Fitzpatrick v. D. M. Osborne & Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1892
- Hefner v. HaynesSupreme Court of Iowa · 1894
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Wasatch Orchard Co. v. Morgan Canning Co.Utah Supreme Court · 1907
- Inner Shoe Tire Co. v. TondroCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1927
- Morris & Co. v. Power Mfg. Co.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1927
- Loisseau v. GatesSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1913
- Leitner v. ThayerWyoming Supreme Court · 1916
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.