Perlasca v. Sparcella
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
IN ERROR. ■ili RROR to the Common Pleas of Philadelphia. If special bail has been entered at the commencement of a SU11’ !n a sum sufficient to secure the amount ^rdedbyarbitrators in the necessaryVoif the defendant intitle himself to days after judgment, according to the 11th section of the act Jsio^ndthif seventh section of the act of f¡¡QQ^a' An amicable action was instituted on the 8th December 1810 by Spargella against the plaintiff in error, in which special bail was…
Read the full summary
IN ERROR. ■ili RROR to the Common Pleas of Philadelphia. If special bail has been entered at the commencement of a SU11’ !n a sum sufficient to secure the amount ^rdedbyarbitrators in the necessaryVoif the defendant intitle himself to days after judgment, according to the 11th section of the act Jsio^ndthif seventh section of the act of f¡¡QQ^a' An amicable action was instituted on the 8th December 1810 by Spargella against the plaintiff in error, in which special bail was entered in 800 dollars. A rule of arbitration was taken on the 14th, the arbitrators appointed on the 26th, and on the…
1Opinion of the Court
Tilghman C. J.
This is a writ of error to the court of. Common Pleas of Philadelphia county. The error complained of, is in issuing the execution. It was an amicable action entered by agreement qn/t'he 8th of December 1810, and submitted to arbitration. On the day of entering the action, special bail was entered by the defendant in 800 dollars. On the 11th January 1811, a report of the arbitrators for 404 dollars 00 cents in favour of the plaintiff was- filed, and judgment entered; and on the 4th February 1811, the plain*429tiff took outran execution. The plaintiff in error, who was defendant…
2Cited by1 opinion
- Spalding v. NolcottSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1836