Legal Opinion · Concurrence

In re Haynes

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided March 7, 2013No. 12-767Published

1ConcurrencePaul E. Danielson, Justice

I concur in the granting of Haynes’s petition for readmission and write simply to call yet again, as I have done previously, for the reexamination of our rules regarding sanction, disbarment, and readmission due to the disparity of treatment that so often occurs from case to case. See In re Petition for Readmission of Harold Wayne Madden to the Arkansas Bar, 2012 Ark. 279, 423 S.W.3d 39 (Danielson, J., dissenting). It is this court that is charged with regulating the practice of law. See In re Petition 8of Butcher, 322 Ark. 24, 907 S.W.2d 715 (1995). Therefore, it is this court’s…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. In re Petition of ButcherSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1995
  2. In re Petition for Readmission of MaddenSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2012

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API