Legal Opinion

Christensen v. Christensen

Utah Supreme Court

Decided May 6, 1918No. 3217PublishedCited by 2 opinions

Original proceedings in mandamus by Lars Christensen against George Christensen, as Judge of the District Court of Emery County, and others. ■Writ to issue if district court does not proceed with case after being served with copy of the opinion.

1Opinion of the Court

FRICK, C. J. .

The plaintiff applied to this court for an alternative writ of mandate to require the defendant Hon. George Christen*255sen, as Judge of the district court of Emery county, Utah, to assume jurisdiction of and to hear plaintiff’s appeal and to determine the same on the merits. The plaintiff, in his application, in substance, alleges: That on the 4th day of December, 1917, in an action then pending before one Le Roy Black, justice of the peace in and for Huntington precinct, Emery county, Utah, wherein the plaintiff herein was plaintiff and George and Kanakis Ritzakis were defendants,…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Ketchum Coal Co. v. District Court of Carbon CountyUtah Supreme Court · 1916
  2. Hoffman v. LewisUtah Supreme Court · 1906
  3. State ex rel. Snell v. Third Judicial District CourtUtah Supreme Court · 1909
  4. McLeran v. MorganSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1871
  5. Peale v. ClarkUtah Supreme Court · 1917

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. George B. Leavitt Co. v. CouturierUtah Supreme Court · 1933
  2. In Re the Estate of Cheong ChinnHawaii Supreme Court · 1961

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API