Legal Opinion
DaimlerChrysler Corp. v. Victoria
Supreme Court of New Hampshire
Decided June 14, 2006No. 2005-357PublishedCited by 15 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtDalianis, J.
The petitioner, DaimlerChrysler Corporation, appeals the decision of the Superior Court (MorriU, J.) affirming the new motor vehicle arbitration board’s (board) award to the respondent, Darren Victoria (consumer), for his defective automobile. We vacate in part and remand.
The trial court found or the record supports the following facts. On December 30, 2003, the consumer purchased a 2004 Dodge Neon SXT from Rochester Dodge in Rochester (dealer), an independent authorized DaimlerChrysler dealer. The manufacturer’s suggested retail price of the vehicle was $15,990. The sale of the vehicle was…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Conservation Law Foundation v. New Hampshire Wetlands CouncilSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2003
- New Hampshire Department of Revenue Administration v. Public Employee Labor Relations BoardSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1977
- Thompson v. 10,000 RV Sales, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 2005
- DeLucca v. DeLuccaSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2005
- Starr v. GovernorSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2004
3Cited by15 opinions
- State v. DuranSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2008
- New Hampshire Department of Environmental Services v. MarinoSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2007
- State v. WillisSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2013
- Cecere v. Loon Mountain Recreation Corp.Supreme Court of New Hampshire · 2007
- Appeal of MorrisseySupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2013
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.