Legal Opinion

Klein v. 124-132 White Street, Inc.

Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York

Decided December 3, 1963PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Per curiam

Section 192 (subd. c, par. [2]) of the New York City Civil Court Act does not preclude consideration of a motion to increase the ad damnum clause above $3,000 on the merits, simply because the case was originally instituted in the Municipal Court and transferred automatically. (Cohen v. Bezold, 37 Misc 2d 1081; Dolce v. Cayuga Foundation Corp., 38 Misc 2d 1078.)

The order should be reversed, without costs, and motion remanded for determination on the merits.

Concur — Brown, Gulotta and Croat, JJ.

Order reversed, etc.

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Dolce v. Cayuga Foundation Corp.Civil Court of the City of New York · 1963
  2. Coheh v. BezoldCivil Court of the City of New York · 1963

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Newman v. CoakleyDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1972
  2. Sobelsohn v. PincusNew York Supreme Court · 1964