State v. Minarik

MARY J. BOYLE, J.:

{¶ 1} Defendant-appellant, Matthew Minarik, appeals his conviction for sexual imposition, a misdemeanor of the third degree, and his sentence. He raises three assignments of error for our review:

1. The defendant was denied the effective assistance of counsel, in derogation of his rights under the Sixth and Fourteenth Amendments to the United States Constitution, and Article I, Section 10 of the Ohio Constitution.

2. The trial court abused its discretion and/or otherwise issued an unlawful sentence when it imposed as a condition of probation that a physician's assistant,…