Hines Nurseries, Inc. v. Plumstead Township Board of Supervisors
Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania
1Dissent
Dissenting OPINION BY
Judge FRIEDMAN.
I respectfully dissent. Unlike the majority, I believe the decision of the Plum-stead Township (Township) Board of Supervisors (Board) fails to comport with section 508(2) of the Pennsylvania Municipalities Planning Code (MPC).1 Therefore, I agree with Ari Van Wingerden’s (Van Wingerden) argument that the Subdivision and Land Development Application (Application) filed by Hines Nurseries, Inc., t/a Hines Color (Hines) should be deemed approved without conditions. On this basis, I would reverse the trial court’s order.
Compliance with section 508(2) of the…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Gaudenzia, Inc. v. Zoning Board of AdjustmentCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1972
- Advantage Development, Inc. v. Board of Supervisors of Jackson TownshipCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2000
- Gulla v. North Strabane TownshipCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1996
- Whiteland Manor Homes, Inc. v. Borough of DowningtownCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1977
- Board of Commissioners v. HaslettCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1982
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.