Legal Opinion
Chromaceutical Advanced Technologies, Inc. v. Lundy & Davis, L.L.P.
Louisiana Court of Appeal
Decided February 4, 2009No. CA 08-653PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
SAUNDERS, Judge.
JjFACTS AND PROCEDURAL HISTORY:
Chromaceutical Advanced Technologies, Inc. (hereinafter “Chromaceutical”) filed suit in the Fourteenth Judicial District Court to annul a default judgment obtained against it by Lundy and Davis, L.L.P. (hereinafter “Lundy”). The trial court granted Lundy’s exception of no cause of action, finding that Chromaceutical’s petition failed to assert facts and allegations for which the law provides a remedy. When Chromaceutical sought leave to amend the petition to remove the grounds of the exception, the trial court refused. Chromaceutical brings this…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Industrial Companies, Inc. v. DurbinSupreme Court of Louisiana · 2003
- Giron v. Housing Auth. of City of OpelousasSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1981
- Farmco, Inc. v. West Baton Rouge Parish Governing CouncilSupreme Court of Louisiana · 2001
- Gilbert v. PearsonLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1985
3Cited by3 opinions
- First Bank & Trust v. SharpLouisiana Court of Appeal · 2018
- Yellowbird Investments, L.L.C. v. BarberLouisiana Court of Appeal · 2012
- Chromaceutical Advanced Technologies, Inc. v. Lundy & Davis, L.L.P.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 2009