Legal Opinion
Fortenberry v. Clay
Louisiana Court of Appeal
Decided November 13, 1953No. 3739PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
68 So.2d 133 (1953)
FORTENBERRY
v.
CLAY et al.
No. 3739.
Court of Appeal of Louisiana, First Circuit.
November 13, 1953.
Nealon Stracener, Baton Rouge, for appellant.
Breazeale, Sachse & Wilson, Baton Rouge, for appellees.
LOTTINGER, Judge.
This is a suit for personal injuries sustained by petitioner, Cloy E. Fortenberry, in an automobile accident. The defendants are Otis Clay and his insurer, Fidelity-Phoenix Fire Insurance Company. The defendants filed an exception of no right of action, which exceptions were sustained by the lower court and, accordingly petitioner's suit was dismissed. The…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Hope v. MadisonSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1940
- Norton v. Crescent City Ice Mfg. Co.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1933
- Thompson v. Kivett ReelLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1946
3Cited by8 opinions
- Archie McConnell v. The Travelers Indemnity Company and Employers Casualty Company of DallasCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1965
- Benroth v. Continental Casualty CompanyDistrict Court, W.D. Louisiana · 1955
- Carney v. Hartford Accident & Indemnity Co.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1971
- Honeycutt v. Town of BoyceLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1976
- Emmco Insurance Company v. Nola Cabs, Inc.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1960
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.