Legal Opinion
Cosmonova, LLC v. Biofilm, Inc.
District Court, S.D. California
Decided May 28, 2025No. 3:24-cv-01453Unknown
1Opinion
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 11 SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 12 13 COSMONOVA, LLC, Case No. 24-cv-1453-MMA-JLB 14 Plaintiff, ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND 15 v. DENYING IN PART PLAINTIFF’S MOTION TO STRIKE 16 BIOFILM, INC., et al., 17 Defendants. [Doc. No. 27] 18 19 20 21 On March 26, 2025, Plaintiff Cosmonova, LLC (“Plaintiff”) filed a motion to 22 strike Defendants Biofilm, Inc.’s and Combe, Inc.’s (collectively, “Defendants”) answer 23 to its first amended complaint. Doc. No. 27. Defendants filed a response in opposition, 24 to which Plaintiff replied. Doc. Nos. 29–30.…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Fogerty v. Fantasy, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1994
- Whittlestone, Inc. v. Handi-Craft Co.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2010
- Fantasy, Inc. v. FogertyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1993
- Danjaq LLC v. Sony Corp.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2001
- Rosales v. Citibank, Federal Savings BankDistrict Court, N.D. California · 2001
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.