Anderson v. Hammon
Oregon Supreme Court
Appeal from Jackson county: L. E. Webster, judge. This was a suit in equity brought by the plaintiff and appellant to have a lease cancelled, and for damages, and for a temporary injunction pending the suit. A large amount of evidence was taken; and, after a full hearing, the court found that the evidence failed to sustain the complaint and dismissed the suit. From the decree rendered herein this appeal is taken.
1Opinion of the CourtLord, J.
The plaintiff in his complaint alleges, that at the execution of the lease sought to be cancelled he was the owner of a valuable apple orchard, consisting of thirty acres, and also twenty acres or more set with peach, plum and apricot trees; that each was in a good and healthy condition when taken possession of by the defendants; that, induced by the representations of the defendants, they would cultivate, prune and care for said orchard if a lease could be obtained for the same, the plaintiff entered into a written lease with the defendants to have said orchards for the period of five years,…
2Cited by5 opinions
- Eliason v. EliasonMontana Supreme Court · 1968
- Hickman v. MulderCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1976
- Olson v. BedkeIdaho Supreme Court · 1976
- Higinbotham v. WolfordOregon Supreme Court · 1921
- Slate Creek Mining Co. v. SundtDistrict Court, D. Alaska · 1932