Legal Opinion

Pearce v. Gunter

Louisiana Court of Appeal

Decided April 8, 1969No. 2649PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SAVOY, Judge.

The question of law presented on this appeal is whether summary procedure may be used by the plaintiff in obtaining a mandatory injunction through a rule nisi to require the penning of cattle for brucel-losis testing.

Plaintiff instituted suit for a mandatory injunction to enforce the provisions of LSA-R.S. 3:2221 and requiring the defendant to restrain his cattle for identification and brucellosis testing. The prayer of plaintiff’s petition was (1) for issuance of a rule nisi requiring the defendant to show cause why a mandatory injunction should not issue ordering him to confine…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Broussard v. CormierSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1923
  2. Harris v. PierceLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1954
  3. Gamburg v. City of AlexandriaLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1956
  4. Board of Com'rs of Petite Anse Drainage Dist. v. Iberia & Vermilion R.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1906
  5. Boos v. McClendonSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1912

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. State, Dept. of Hwys. v. LAMAR ADVERTISING COMPANY OF LOUISIANA, INC.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1973
  2. Pearce v. GunterSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1969
  3. Louisiana Livestock Sanitary Board v. ManuelLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1976
  4. Louisiana Livestock Sanitary Board v. ManuelLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1976

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API