Pearce v. Gunter
Louisiana Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the Court
SAVOY, Judge.
The question of law presented on this appeal is whether summary procedure may be used by the plaintiff in obtaining a mandatory injunction through a rule nisi to require the penning of cattle for brucel-losis testing.
Plaintiff instituted suit for a mandatory injunction to enforce the provisions of LSA-R.S. 3:2221 and requiring the defendant to restrain his cattle for identification and brucellosis testing. The prayer of plaintiff’s petition was (1) for issuance of a rule nisi requiring the defendant to show cause why a mandatory injunction should not issue ordering him to confine…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Broussard v. CormierSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1923
- Harris v. PierceLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1954
- Gamburg v. City of AlexandriaLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1956
- Board of Com'rs of Petite Anse Drainage Dist. v. Iberia & Vermilion R.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1906
- Boos v. McClendonSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1912
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- State, Dept. of Hwys. v. LAMAR ADVERTISING COMPANY OF LOUISIANA, INC.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1973
- Pearce v. GunterSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1969
- Louisiana Livestock Sanitary Board v. ManuelLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1976
- Louisiana Livestock Sanitary Board v. ManuelLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1976