Legal Opinion
Lanoue v. Rizk
District Court of Appeal of Florida
Decided June 25, 2008No. 3D07-1470PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
987 So.2d 724 (2008)
Denis LANOUE, Appellant,
v.
David M. RIZK, Appellee.
No. 3D07-1470.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.
June 25, 2008.
Icard, Merrill, Cullis, Timm, Furen & Ginsburg and Charles J. Bartlett, Sarasota, for appellant.
Salomon, Kanner, Damian & Rodriguez and Vincent E. Damian, Jr., Miami, for appellee.
Before COPE, RAMIREZ, and SUAREZ, JJ.
COPE, J.
The question before us is whether the lender's suit on a promissory note is barred by the statute of limitations. The main point of disagreement is whether the choice of law is that of Florida or Ontario, Canada.
David M.…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- State Farm Mut. Auto. Ins. Co. v. RoachSupreme Court of Florida · 2006
- Lumbermens Mut. Cas. Co. v. AugustSupreme Court of Florida · 1988
- Jemco, Inc. v. United Parcel Service, Inc.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1981
- Ellis v. UNITED SERVICES AUTO. ASS'NDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2005
- Herman v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 2006
3Cited by5 opinions
- David v. American Suzuki Motor Corp.District Court, S.D. Florida · 2009
- Sims v. NEW FALLS CORP.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 2010
- Bayuk v. PrisiajnioukDistrict Court, M.D. Florida · 2019
- Sims v. NEW FALLS CORP.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 2010
- Sims v. NEW FALLS CORP.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 2010