Legal Opinion · Dissent

Regency West Apartments LLC v. City of Racine

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided December 22, 2016No. 2014AP002947Published

1Dissent

¶ 74.

SHIRLEY S. ABRAHAMSON, J.

0dissent-ing). Fortunately for Regency West (and unfortunately for Racine's coffers and the other Racine taxpayers), the majority opinion declares that the lower assessment of the property at issue is correct. The majority opinion flouts the longstanding principle that property tax assessors should use the best information possible in order to determine real property's full value, upends the proper scope of appellate review, and inserts itself as a fact-finder. Because of the majority opinion's unwarranted departures from precedent and usurpation of the role of…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Rosen v. City of MilwaukeeWisconsin Supreme Court · 1976
  2. Waste Management of Wisconsin, Inc. v. Kenosha County Board of ReviewWisconsin Supreme Court · 1994
  3. State ex rel. International Business Machines Corp. v. Board of ReviewWisconsin Supreme Court · 1939
  4. Bloomer Housing Ltd. Partnership v. City of BloomerCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 2002
  5. Bonstores Realty One, LLC v. City of WauwatosaCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 2013

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API