Legal Opinion
Cincinnati Insurance v. South Carolina Second Injury Fund
Court of Appeals of South Carolina
Decided February 6, 1989No. 1285PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Sanders, Chief Judge:
Appellant Cincinnati Insurance Company made claim against respondent South Carolina Second Injury Fund for reimbursement of certain Workers’ Compensation benefits. The Workers’ Compensation Commission dismissed the claim, finding that Cincinnati Insurance had not notified the Second Injury Fund of the claim as required by Section 42-9-400(f), Code of Laws of South Carolina, 1976, as amended. The Circuit Court affirmed the order of the Commission. We affirm the order of the Circuit Court.
Section 42-9-400(f), which is a part of “The South Carolina Workers’ Compensation…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Dunton v. South Carolina Board of ExaminersSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1987
- Rapid Motor Lines, Inc. v. CoxSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1947
- Johnson Service Co. v. Climate Control Contractors, Inc.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1972
- Merchants Mutual Insurance v. South Carolina Second Injury FundSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1982
- O'Neil v. City of BostonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1926
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- South Carolina Second Injury Fund v. American Yard ProductsSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1998
- Sajko v. Jefferson County Board of EducationKentucky Supreme Court · 2010
- Cincinnati Insurance v. South Carolina Second Injury FundSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1990